An analytical study of the final exam questions for some faculties of physical education and sports sciences
Keywords:
Analytical study of final exam questions, faculties of physical education and sports sciencesAbstract
Assessment process is a fundamental technique to make educational decisions regard enhance curriculums, teaching methods along with disclosure student’s attainment. Blooms’ study showed majority of teachers were used to make questions from retention and comprehension levels to examine student, and he mentioned those question don’t improve educational outcomes and he was recommended to used question improve that aspect rely on his hierarchical models to build teacher’s attainment question. Physical education and sport science aimed to enable there student from turning their knowledge to actuality. Used high percentage from retention and comprehension questions will not enhance high level form of thinking .so that, current study was employed documentary research design to exam final exam’s questions and employed purposive sample technique, in order to select sample which was papers of final exam in these colleges first attempt in 2018-2017. This study found out question which enhance high form of thinking was too scarce and it was limited between (0.006-0.03). Finally, this study recommended conducting survey study to disclose teachers’ knowledge regard cognitive domain of Bloom's taxonomy
References
- Acikgoz, U.K. (2011). Active Learning. İzmir: Bilis Publishing.
Akbulut, T. (1999). The Evaluation of Questioning Skills of Primary School Teachers in Terms of Certain Variables. Cukurova University, Unpublished Master Thesis, Mersin.
- Akbulut, T. (1999). The Evaluation of Questioning Skills of Primary School Teachers in Terms of Certain Variables. Cukurova University, Unpublished Master Thesis, Mersin.
- Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
- Ayvaci, H. S. & Turkdogan, A. (2010). Investigating the Questions of Science and Technology Course According to Revized Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 13-25.
- Baysen, E. (2006). The Levels of Teacher Questions and Student Answers. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 14(1), 21-28.
- Begg, A. (1997. Some emerging influences underpinning assessment in statistics. In The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education. Gal, I. and Garfield, J.B. (edit.) IOS Press, 17-25.
- Bekaroglu, A. (2007). Investigation and Evaluation of the Written Exam Questions of Primary School 6th Grade Accroding to Question Levels The Case of Kastamonu. Abant İzzet Baysal University, Unpublished Master Thesis, Bolu.
- Bhagooli, R.(2011). Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to Analyze the Level of Learning in University Biology Education. University of Mauritius Research Journal,17 ,pp, 209-233.
- Bishop DVM, Adam C (1989). Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorders : What features lead to a judgement of inappropriacy? British Journal of Disorders of Communication 24, pp, 241-264.
- Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook. Cognitive domain.New York:McKay.
- Cangelosi, J.S. (1990) Designing Tests for evaluating student achievement. London: Longman.
- Cepni, S. & Azar, A. (1998). Analysis of The Questions Asked in High School Physics Exams. Proposal Presented at the. National Science Teaching Symposium. Karadeniz Technical University.
- CikrikciDemirtasli, R. N. (2012). Measurement and Evaluation in Education. Ankara: Elhan Book Printing-Distribution.
- Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teacher’s College Record, 102, 294-343.
- Colak, K. (2008). Classification of History Exam Questions According to Cognitive Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Social Sciences, Unpublished Master Thesis, Trabzon.
- Crowe A., Dirks, C., and Wenderoth, M.P. (2008), “Biology in bloom: Implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology.” CBE Life Sci Edu. Vol. 7, 368-381.
- Danielson, C. (2008). Assessment for learning: For teachers as well as students. In C.A. Dwyer (Ed). The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning New York: Taylor &Francis.
- Demirel, O. (2010). Curriculum Development in Education: Theory into Practice. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
- Diab, S., & Sartawi, B.(2017). classification of questions and learning outcome statements (los) into bloom’s taxonomy (bt) by similarity measurements towards extracting of learning outcome from learning material. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 9(2), pp,1-12.
- Dunham, B., yapa, G., & yu, E.(2015). Calibrating the Difficulty of an Assessment Tool: The Blooming of a Statistics Examination. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(3), pp, 1-33.
- Edington, s., & Hunt c., (1996). Teaching Consultation Process Sourcebook. Classroom Evaluation and Assessment. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, page 57-66.
- Es, H. (2005). An Evaluation of Science Exam Questions of Primary School Science Courses According to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Unpublished Mater Thesis, Ankara.
- Filiz, S. B. (2004). The Art of Asking Questions. Ankara: Asil Printing-Distribution.
- Garfield, J.B. (1994), “Beyond Testing and Grading: Using Assessment To Improve Student Learning.” Journal of Statistics Education Vol.2 No.1.
- Gezer, M., Sunkur, M., & Sahin, I.(2014). An evaluation of the exam questions of social studies course according to revized bloom’s taxonomy. Education Science and Psychology,2(28),pp, 3-17.
- Gichuhi, c.(2011). Teachers’competence in tests construction within blooms taxonomy for effective learning assessment: A case study of kikuyu district, kiambu county (Master dissertation, The University of Nairobi).
- Gronlund, N. E. (2006). Assessment of student achievement. (8thed.). Boston: Pearson.
- Guba, E. and Y.S. Lincoln. 1981. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Hummel, J., & Huitt, W. (1994). What You Measure is What You Get.Gaasdnewsletter: The Reporter, 10-11.
- Kastberg, S. (2014). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as a framework for classroom assessment. Mathematics Teacher, 96(6), 402-405.
- Kennedy, D.(2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide, Cork: University College Cork.
- Lissitz, R.W., & Schafer, W.D. (2002). Assessment in educational reform: Both means and ends.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Miller, C. & Nentl, N. (2001). Learning by playing: Teaching business learners with computer simulations,Conference Proceedings Emerging Issues in Business and Technology. Myrtle Beach, NC.
- Morgan, N. & Saxton, J. (1994). Asking Better Questions. Ontario: Pembroke Publications.
- Newman, P. M. (1990). Higher Order Thinking in Teaching Social Studies: A Rationale For The Assessment of Classroom Thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 41-56.
- Oermann, M. H. & Kathleen B. G. (2013). Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education. Springer Publishing Company.
- Oguneye, W. (2002). Continuous assessment: Practice and prospects. Lagos:Providence Publishers.
- Ogunleye, (2002). Keynote Address on Agricultural mechanization in integrated rural development. Proc. NSAE 2, 16 – 25.
- Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative
- Research Methods. (Vol.2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8.
Rust, C. (2002). Purposes and principles of assessment. Oxford Center for Staff and Learning Development, Learning and Teaching Briefing Paper Series.
- Shaunessy, E. (2000). Questioning Techniques in the Gifted Classroom. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 23(5).
- Silverman, D. 1993. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
- Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Stephens, d., & Percik, d.(2003). Constructing a Test Bank for Information Science based upon Bloom’s principles. Innovation in Teaching and Learning inInformation and Computer Sciences,2(1), pp,1-28.
- Sumner, R. (1987). The role of testing in school. Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.Tanalol, s., Fattah,s., Sulong, r., & Mamat, m.(2001). Mining Exam Question based on Bloom’s Taxonomy.retrived from https://pdfs.semantic scholar.org/ 97c2/52f2124d554c5fe57 32cb8 eb2 047a23e8558.pdf
Tuzel, S., Yilmaz E. & Bal, M. (2013). An Investigation of Prospective Turkish Teachers’ Questions Regarding Text Processing in Accordance with Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(8), 1085-1100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Modern Sport
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
